argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Newton's-law correction check
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →The Randall-Sundrum II braneworld is holographically dual to four-dimensional gravity coupled to a strongly coupled conformal field theory with a cutoff
The argument
Because the leading correction to Newton's law computed classically in the five-dimensional bulk matches the one-loop graviton correction from conformal field theory matter in four dimensions, the two descriptions agree on a nontrivial subleading observable, which is what the proposed duality predicts.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →The leading correction to Newton's law in the Randall-Sundrum II model matches the one-loop graviton correction from the dual conformal field theory
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.