argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Authors' sensitivity analyses and correction
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →Pekar et al.'s two-spillover phylodynamic inference is robust to model assumptions
The argument
Because linked claim, the authors' own corrected reanalysis did not overturn the qualitative two-spillover conclusion, which bears in favour of the inference being stable under at least the errors identified and the robustness checks the authors themselves performed.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- VerifiedThe evidence, examined directly, establishes the claim.constitution →Pekar et al.'s corrected analysis retained the two-spillover conclusion after the 2023 erratum
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.