argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Simulation evidence
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →Radiation from a micro black hole accreting inside dense stellar matter is trapped and advected inward with the accretion flow
The argument
Because general-relativistic simulations find that black holes inside neutron stars accrete at the Bondi rate with no radiative feedback halting the flow, the embedded-accretion regime behaves as it would if the radiation were trapped and advected inward, which is what the claim predicts.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →Black holes inside neutron stars accrete at the Bondi rate without radiative feedback halting the accretion
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.