argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Semiclassical derivation and convergence of methods
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →Quantum field theory in curved spacetime predicts thermal radiation from black hole event horizons.
The argument
Because Hawking's semiclassical calculation shows that gravitational collapse produces steady thermal emission at a temperature set by the horizon's surface gravity, quantum field theory in curved spacetime yields the prediction directly; and because independent theoretical derivations converge on the same black hole temperature, the result does not rest on the details of any single calculation.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →Hawking's semiclassical calculation shows gravitational collapse produces steady thermal emission at temperature proportional to horizon surface gravity
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →Independent theoretical derivations converge on the same black hole temperature.
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.