Minerval

← the claim it bears on

A line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →

Hadron-level calibration

The argument

Calibration fits compare generator output for hadron-level observables, such as 2-jettiness in electron-positron collisions, against resummed calculations carried out in field-theoretically defined mass schemes. Because these fits find the Monte Carlo mass within about 200 MeV of the MSR mass at 1 GeV, and the MSR mass at that scale converts to the pole mass with a shift of a few hundred MeV, the Monte Carlo mass agrees with the pole mass to within roughly 600 MeV or better.

Does it work?

Does it follow?
If the premises are true, the conclusion is much more likely, though not guaranteed.constitution →
Do the premises hold?
1 verified

Suppose the generator mass agrees with the MSR mass at 1 GeV to within about 200 MeV. Converting with perturbative QCD then puts it within roughly 350 to 600 MeV of the pole mass. That is a few hundred MeV, but only at the generous end of the phrase. The calibration finding is verified for three generators. What falls short of certainty is the step from electron-positron event shapes to LHC top-quark final states, which is assumed rather than tested, and the vagueness of "a few hundred MeV" at the upper bound.

Premises

Where it is made

Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.

No source is recorded as making it.

Earlier ratings