argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Bounded growth caps radiated power
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →Consistent application of the Casadio–Harms model yields micro black-hole radiated power far below hazardous levels.
The argument
Because linked claim, a black hole treated consistently within the Casadio–Harms model never exceeds a small equilibrium mass, and the model's own luminosity expression evaluated at that mass gives a radiated power on the order of a tenth of a microwatt, roughly twenty-three orders of magnitude below the hazardous figures claimed for the same object.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- SupportedThe evidence favors the claim, but the examination is incomplete or the evidence is indirect.constitution →Evaporation of warped brane-world micro black holes outpaces accretion above a small critical mass
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.