argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Photon trapping condition
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →Radiation from a micro black hole accreting inside dense stellar matter is trapped and advected inward with the accretion flow
The argument
Because the photon trapping radius far exceeds the Bondi radius for micro black holes in white-dwarf or neutron-star matter, photons generated near the hole diffuse outward more slowly than the surrounding matter falls in, and given that the flow inside a star is quasi-spherical rather than disk-like, there is no low-density channel through which they could escape instead. The radiation is therefore carried inward with the accreting matter rather than emerging to push back on the inflow.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →For micro black holes accreting in white-dwarf or neutron-star matter, the photon trapping radius far exceeds the Bondi radius
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →Accretion flow onto a black hole embedded inside a star is quasi-spherical rather than disk-like
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.