Minerval

← the claim it bears on

A line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →

NLO coherent-branching derivation

The argument

Because the coherent-branching mass at next-to-leading order differs from the pole mass by a shift linear in the shower infrared cutoff, and given that the pole mass carries an intrinsic renormalon ambiguity, the cutoff acts as an infrared subtraction that removes the renormalon, which is the defining property of a short-distance scheme; numerically the shift amounts to roughly 300 to 500 MeV for the top quark at the Herwig 7 cutoff of 1.25 GeV. Independently of the derivation, calibration studies find the Monte Carlo top-quark mass agrees with the MSR mass at 1 GeV within about 200 MeV, as expected if the generator mass is a low-scale short-distance mass rather than the pole mass.

Does it work?

Not yet evaluated.

Premises

Where it is made

Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.

No source is recorded as making it.

Earlier ratings

NLO coherent-branching derivation · Minerval