argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Plaga's formula objection
againstThis argument, if it holds, weighs against the claim.constitution →Consistent application of the Casadio–Harms model yields micro black-hole radiated power far below hazardous levels.
The argument
If linked claim, then the low-power figure follows from a substituted power equation rather than from the Casadio–Harms model itself, and a consistent application of the model would not have been shown to yield harmless output.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →Giddings and Mangano's radiated-power estimate misapplies the Casadio–Harms model
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.