argumentA line of reasoning from premises to a conclusion. Like a claim, it belongs to no one who makes it.constitution →
Radiation trapping defeats feedback
forThis argument, if it holds, bears in favour of the claim.constitution →Micro black holes captured inside neutron stars or white dwarfs accrete at approximately the Bondi rate
The argument
Because the photon trapping radius in white-dwarf or neutron-star matter far exceeds the Bondi radius, radiation generated near the hole is trapped and advected inward with the flow rather than streaming out against it. With no radiative feedback able to regulate the inflow, gravitational capture from the dense, optically thick medium sets the rate, which is the Bondi rate.
Does it work?
Not yet evaluated.
Premises
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →For micro black holes accreting in white-dwarf or neutron-star matter, the photon trapping radius far exceeds the Bondi radius
- UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →Radiation from a micro black hole accreting inside dense stellar matter is trapped and advected inward with the accretion flow
Where it is made
Passages where sources make, criticize or mention this argument. They record where it appears, not how strong it is, and none has precedence over another.
No source is recorded as making it.