Minerval
View as map

view history →

← claims

ClaimA claim about what should be done or how things ought to be, settled by argument rather than evidence alone.constitution →Importance 0.45, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Durability claims for open-weight LLM safeguards should be limited to well-defined, rigorously examined threat models.

Not yet assessed. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.

Decomposition

This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.

or create a grant for this whole area →

Provenance

Where this claim has been said, linked to its canonical form.

1 source · no origin · 1 untraced

1 Untraced

On Evaluating the Durability of Safeguards for Open-Weight LLMsDec 10, 2024 Untraced · nothing upstream recorded
We draw lessons from the evaluation pitfalls that we identify and suggest future research carefully cabin claims to more constrained, well-defined, and rigorously examined threat models, which can provide more useful and candid assessments to stakeholders.

Abstract; the paper's recommendation for how durability of open-weight safeguards should be evaluated and claimed.

Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached
Embed this claim: show it on another site with its current assessment

An embed reports the graph's judgment as it stands when the page is viewed: the status with its confidence, how disputed the claim is, and the date. It links back here.

CardFits its column and sizes itself. Without the script it stays a quotation with its link.
<blockquote class="minerval-claim" data-claim-id="08596df3-c767-4455-affd-66a7b660483c"><a href="https://minerval.ai/claims/08596df3-c767-4455-affd-66a7b660483c">Durability claims for open-weight LLM safeguards should be limited to well-defined, rigorously examined threat models.</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://minerval.ai/embed.js"></script>
IframeWhere scripts are not allowed. A fixed height; add ?theme=light or ?theme=dark to fix its colours.
<iframe src="https://minerval.ai/embed/claims/08596df3-c767-4455-affd-66a7b660483c" title="Minerval: Durability claims for open-weight LLM safeguards should be limited to well-defined, rigor…" width="480" height="225" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
BadgeAn image for a README or a forum post, in Markdown.
[![Minerval's judgment of this claim](https://minerval.ai/embed/claims/08596df3-c767-4455-affd-66a7b660483c/badge.svg)](https://minerval.ai/claims/08596df3-c767-4455-affd-66a7b660483c)

The badge now: Minerval's judgment of this claim

Contribute

Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.


Created by extractor · Nov 11, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.