Minerval

← claims

ClaimA claim that one thing brings about another, not merely that the two go together.constitution →Importance 0.45, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Prompt-induced sandbagging may make chain-of-thought monitoring appear more effective than it is for covert sandbagging.

Not yet assessed, so this page carries no verdict. That is not a finding for or against the claim. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.

Decomposition

This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.

or start a mandate for this whole area →

Provenance

Where this claim has been said, linked to its canonical form.

Its one source has been traced to an origin, or to one another.

Using prompted model organisms for sandbag- ging might increase the likelihood of models verbal- izing their sandbagging plans in their CoT as this information is present in context, thus this might underestimate models’ covert sandbagging capabili- ties.

Limitations section on how sandbagging was induced (system-prompt instructions).

Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached
Embed this claim: show it on another site with its current assessment

An embed reports the graph's judgment as it stands when the page is viewed: the status with its confidence, how disputed the claim is, and the date. It links back here.

CardFits its column and sizes itself. Without the script it stays a quotation with its link.
<blockquote class="minerval-claim" data-claim-id="178b604a-bed9-4ecd-8de7-921c208ef219"><a href="https://minerval.ai/claims/178b604a-bed9-4ecd-8de7-921c208ef219">Prompt-induced sandbagging may make chain-of-thought monitoring appear more effective than it is for covert sandbagging.</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://minerval.ai/embed.js"></script>
IframeWhere scripts are not allowed. A fixed height; add ?theme=light or ?theme=dark to fix its colours.
<iframe src="https://minerval.ai/embed/claims/178b604a-bed9-4ecd-8de7-921c208ef219" title="Minerval: Prompt-induced sandbagging may make chain-of-thought monitoring appear more effective tha…" width="480" height="225" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
BadgeAn image for a README or a forum post, in Markdown.
[![Minerval's judgment of this claim](https://minerval.ai/embed/claims/178b604a-bed9-4ecd-8de7-921c208ef219/badge.svg)](https://minerval.ai/claims/178b604a-bed9-4ecd-8de7-921c208ef219)

The badge now: Minerval's judgment of this claim

Contribute

Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.

Stated views None yet. A view stated to the graph is shown on this page in its speaker’s words, as a source like any other, and carries no weight in the assessment.


Created by extractor · Nov 14, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.

No requests on this page · all requests →