Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailWidespread generative AI adoption could raise global GDP by about 7% over ten years
Goldman Sachs task-based projection· for
Generative AI could expose the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs worldwide to automation
shared · shown elsewhere
Widespread generative AI adoption could raise annual US labor productivity growth by about 1.5 percentage points over ten years
Access to a generative AI conversational assistant increases customer support agents' productivity by roughly 14-15% on average.
⇄
Generative AI chatbot adoption has had no detectable effect on worker earnings or hours within two years
◌
◌
◌
Generative AI is a significant contributor to the post-2022 acceleration in US labor productivity growth
Modest-effects estimates and diffusion lags· against
AI advances will increase US total factor productivity by less than one percent over ten years
shared · shown elsewhere
General-purpose technologies historically took decades before producing measurable aggregate productivity gains
atomic
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Widespread generative AI adoption could raise global GDP by about 7% over ten years
Credible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
supportsrequirescontradictscontradicts
Nothing in the graph builds on this claim yet.
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →A pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →The claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →Evidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →Credible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →No credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →Available evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →Insufficient information to assess.constitution →No current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisetheoremA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules →⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rules →this provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →this argues against the parentsteward instructions →background the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →a load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.