trailBrane-localized black holes in warped compactifications evaporate rather than remaining stable
Evaporation of warped brane-world micro black holes outpaces accretion above a small critical mass
Semiclassical Hawking emission· for
Quantum field theory in curved spacetime predicts thermal radiation from black hole event horizons.
Hawking's semiclassical calculation shows gravitational collapse produces steady thermal emission at temperature proportional to horizon surface gravity
Independent theoretical derivations converge on the same black hole temperature.
Hawking's original derivation traces outgoing modes back to frequencies far above the Planck scale.
Alternative derivations of Hawking radiation avoid appealing to trans-Planckian frequencies.
+2
Holographic equilibrium interpretation· for
Static brane-localized black hole solutions describe black holes in equilibrium with thermal radiation rather than stable isolated black holes
atomic
Static classical solutions· against
Static black holes localized on the brane exist at all sizes in the Randall-Sundrum II model
atomic
assumed
The Randall-Sundrum II braneworld is holographically dual to four-dimensional gravity coupled to a strongly coupled conformal field theory with a cutoff
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Brane-localized black holes in warped compactifications evaporate rather than remaining stable
↑SupportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →credence 0.85Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment — the Steward prioritises higher-importance claims, so this one is likely still queued.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. — detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.