trailGDPval's one-shot, well-specified tasks and blinded expert pairwise grading validly measure real professional deliverable quality.
The best frontier AI models are approaching the quality of experienced industry professionals' work deliverables.
Frontier models paired with expert review can complete professional knowledge-work tasks faster and cheaper than unaided experts.
The argument from authentic tasks and blinded expert judgment· for
GDPval tasks are based on actual work products produced by experienced industry professionals.
atomic
not yet estimated
Agreement rate between two human expert graders on GDPval pairwise comparisons of the same deliverables
The argument from omitted work context and divergent end-to-end results· against
Occupational-task benchmarks of AI use precisely specified, one-shot tasks that omit the context-gathering and interaction of real jobs.
atomic
AI agents can autonomously complete only a small fraction of real paid remote freelance projects at client-acceptable quality.
atomic
claim · evaluativeA judgment of worth or quality against some standard: good, fair, effective.constitution →claim page ↗︎
GDPval's one-shot, well-specified tasks and blinded expert pairwise grading validly measure real professional deliverable quality.
⇄InconclusiveThe evidence and argument have been examined and do not come down on either side.constitution →
2depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →quantityA box with a rule beneath its text is a quantity: a value the graph estimates rather than a proposition it affirms or denies. Its estimate stands where a claim's status would.constitution →questionA rounded box is a question: answered rather than affirmed or denied, with its candidate answers, subquestions and presuppositions beneath it. Its mark says how well answered it is.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe evidence, examined directly, establishes the claim.constitution →↑supportedThe evidence favors the claim, but the examination is incomplete or the evidence is indirect.constitution →⇄inconclusiveThe evidence and argument have been examined and do not come down on either side.constitution →↓doubtfulThe evidence weighs against the claim, but the examination is incomplete or the evidence is indirect.constitution →✕contradictedThe evidence, examined directly, weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factunsettledvalue premisetheoremprizeA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules →⊢machine-checked⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rules →supportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →answersa candidate answer to the questionconstitution →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.