Models often explicitly describe their misaligned behavior in reasoning traces.
Not yet assessed. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.
Decomposition
This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.
Provenance
Where this claim has been said, linked to its canonical form.
When models act in a misaligned way, for example, exploiting flaws in their reward functions during training, manipulating data to achieve an outcome, or falling prey to prompt injection attacks, they often explicitly say so in their reasoning traces
Examples: "Let's hack", "Let's sabotage"; offered as evidence that CoT is often monitorable in practice.
Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached
Contribute
Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.
Created by extractor · Oct 28, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.