trailStrange quark matter is the true ground state of baryonic matter
Stable or metastable strangelets can exist
Some observed compact stars may be strange quark stars
Theoretical stability window· for
Bag-model calculations allow strange quark matter to be stable for plausible parameter values
Constraints from hadron phenomenology and heavy-ion collisions exclude much of the Farhi–Jaffe strange-matter stability window
Stable strange quark matter is consistent with the observed stability of ordinary nuclei
atomic
Non-observation of strangelets· against
No strangelet has been observed in heavy-ion collision experiments
atomic
Cosmic-ray and terrestrial searches have found no confirmed strangelets
atomic
Finite-size effects may destabilize small strangelets even if bulk strange quark matter is stable
atomic
Up-down quark matter rival· against
Up-down quark matter may be more stable than strange quark matter
shared · shown elsewhere
assumed
First-principles QCD calculations cannot determine whether strange quark matter is stable
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Strange quark matter is the true ground state of baryonic matter
⇄ContestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →credence 0.10Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
2depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisetheoremprizeA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules →⊢machine-checked⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rules →supportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.