Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailHistorically, automation technologies have created more jobs than they have eliminated
AI is more likely to complement most jobs than to substitute for them entirely
The long-run employment record· for
Aggregate employment in industrialized economies has grown over the long run despite widespread automation
atomic
Most U.S. workers today are employed in occupations that did not exist in 1940
atomic
Technology-driven creation of new occupations explains over 85% of long-run U.S. employment growth
atomic
+1 more
Displacement outpacing reinstatement in recent decades· against
Since the 1980s, automation in the United States has displaced labor faster than it has created new tasks for workers
atomic
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Historically, automation technologies have created more jobs than they have eliminated
Evidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
supportssupportssupportssupportscontradicts
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →A pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →The claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →Evidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →Credible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →No credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →Available evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →Insufficient information to assess.constitution →No current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisetheoremA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules →⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rules →this provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →this argues against the parentsteward instructions →background the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →a load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.