Verifying a mathematical proof is easier from formal proof-assistant output than from informal natural-language output.
Not yet assessed. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.
Decomposition
This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.
Provenance
Where this claim has been said, linked to its canonical form.
I actually find it easier to go through the formal output than the informal output. With the formal output, there is no danger of imagining things or misinterpreting the argument.
Commenter David Jao replying to a question about understanding AI-generated proofs.
Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached
Contribute
Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.
Created by extractor · Sep 14, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.