Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailThe phase of a vortex-line operator linking an electric Wilson line distinguishes Higgs from confining regimes
Aharonov-Bohm phases of test quarks around superfluid vortices distinguish Higgs from confining regimes
Topological order or vortex statistics sharply distinguish the color-flavor-locked phase from superfluid hadronic matter
The physically meaningful Aharonov-Bohm phase of a test quark in a superfluid is that of the dressed charge
Duality and strong-coupling construction· for
In a 2+1D lattice gauge theory with fundamental scalars, the phase of a vortex-line correlator linking a Wilson line changes non-analytically between Higgs and confining regimes
Vortex Aharonov-Bohm phases can be measured as order parameters in lattice simulations of gauge-Higgs models
atomic
Dressed-charge matching· against
Aharonov-Bohm phases of dressed quark quasiparticles interpolate smoothly between Higgs and confining regimes
atomic
assumed
Nonanalytic behavior of gauge-invariant correlation functions marks a physical distinction between phases
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
The phase of a vortex-line operator linking an electric Wilson line distinguishes Higgs from confining regimes
Credible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution
specifiessupportscontradictsrequiressupportscontradictsassumes
3depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisetheoremA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rulesthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.