Curriculum poisoning that gradually replaces malicious reasoning with benign reasoning increases CoT-backdoor attack success over direct fine-tuning.
Not yet assessed. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.
Decomposition
This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.
Provenance
Where this claim has been said, linked to its canonical form.
Where direct fine-tuning fails to learn the contradiction between a correct trace and an incorrect answer, a curriculum that gradually replaces malicious reasoning with benign reasoning raises attack success without altering any other attack parameter.
Curriculum poisoning substitutes wrong reasoning steps with correct ones stage by stage while holding the malicious answer fixed.
Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached
Embed this claim: show it on another site with its current assessment
An embed reports the graph's judgment as it stands when the page is viewed: the status with its confidence, how disputed the claim is, and the date. It links back here.
<blockquote class="minerval-claim" data-claim-id="79be10bd-1ac6-4c28-87d3-69f3f55bb9de"><a href="https://minerval.ai/claims/79be10bd-1ac6-4c28-87d3-69f3f55bb9de">Curriculum poisoning that gradually replaces malicious reasoning with benign reasoning increases CoT-backdoor attack success over direct fine-tuning.</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://minerval.ai/embed.js"></script>
<iframe src="https://minerval.ai/embed/claims/79be10bd-1ac6-4c28-87d3-69f3f55bb9de" title="Minerval: Curriculum poisoning that gradually replaces malicious reasoning with benign reasoning in…" width="480" height="225" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
[](https://minerval.ai/claims/79be10bd-1ac6-4c28-87d3-69f3f55bb9de)
The badge now:
Contribute
Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.
Created by extractor · Nov 10, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.