Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailStable neutral black holes produced by cosmic rays would pass through Earth without being gravitationally captured
TeV-scale black holes produced at the LHC pose no significant risk.
Black holes produced by cosmic ray collisions with stationary matter would move at nearly the speed of light
atomic
Gravitational accretion in Earth-density matter cannot appreciably slow a relativistic neutral micro black hole
atomic
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionclaim page ↗︎
Stable neutral black holes produced by cosmic rays would pass through Earth without being gravitationally captured
The claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionCredence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution
contradictsrequiresrequires
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitutionA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitutionThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitutionCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitutionNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitutionAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitutionInsufficient information to assess.constitutionNo current assessment — the Steward prioritises higher-importance claims, so this one is likely still queued.constitutionverified factopen questionvalue premisethis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructionsthis argues against the parentsteward instructionsbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructionsa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructionsFig. — detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.