trailGenerative AI could expose the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs worldwide to automation
Widespread generative AI adoption could raise global GDP by about 7% over ten years
Widespread generative AI adoption could raise annual US labor productivity growth by about 1.5 percentage points over ten years
Task-based derivation from occupational exposure data· for
Roughly two-thirds of U.S. occupations are exposed to some degree of automation by AI
About 80 percent of US workers could have at least 10 percent of their tasks affected by LLMs.
◌
◌
◌
About 60% of jobs in advanced economies are exposed to AI
For AI-exposed occupations, roughly a quarter to half of their workload could be automated
atomic
assumed
Task-based analysis of occupational databases can meaningfully estimate occupations' exposure to AI automation
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Generative AI could expose the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs worldwide to automation
↑SupportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →credence 0.75Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
2depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.