trailCosmic rays with energies exceeding LHC collision energies have struck Earth for billions of years without causing catastrophe.
TeV-scale black holes produced at the LHC pose no significant risk.
Particle collisions at the LHC pose no danger to Earth.
A high-energy particle collision could trigger the universe's vacuum to decay into a more stable state.
claim · empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →claim page ↗︎
Cosmic rays with energies exceeding LHC collision energies have struck Earth for billions of years without causing catastrophe.
unassessedNo current assessment — the Steward prioritises higher-importance claims, so this one is likely still queued.constitution →
3depended on by
This claim has not been assessed yet — the Steward works through claims in order of importance, so lower-importance claims wait their turn. It may well decompose into subclaims once it is processed.
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment — the Steward prioritises higher-importance claims, so this one is likely still queued.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisesupportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. — detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.