Implicit post-hoc rationalization in language models is not caused solely by RLHF-induced sycophancy.
Not yet assessed. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.
Decomposition
This claim has not been assessed yet. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; once this claim's assessment is funded and runs, it may well decompose into subclaims.
Provenance
Where this claim has been said, linked to its canonical form.
Interestingly, the pretrained model Llama 3.1 70B shows a very high percentage of unfaithfulness (32.3%), compared to its instruction tuned counterpart, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (26.6%). This suggests that this pattern of unfaithfulness can not be explained only as a result of models being sycophantic after undergoing RLHF.
Section 2.1.
Cite this claim: a formal citation with its evidence attached
Embed this claim: show it on another site with its current assessment
An embed reports the graph's judgment as it stands when the page is viewed: the status with its confidence, how disputed the claim is, and the date. It links back here.
<blockquote class="minerval-claim" data-claim-id="f5c1a7af-9ce0-4cf8-8de7-9fa6fb8d5acb"><a href="https://minerval.ai/claims/f5c1a7af-9ce0-4cf8-8de7-9fa6fb8d5acb">Implicit post-hoc rationalization in language models is not caused solely by RLHF-induced sycophancy.</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://minerval.ai/embed.js"></script>
<iframe src="https://minerval.ai/embed/claims/f5c1a7af-9ce0-4cf8-8de7-9fa6fb8d5acb" title="Minerval: Implicit post-hoc rationalization in language models is not caused solely by RLHF-induced…" width="480" height="200" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
[](https://minerval.ai/claims/f5c1a7af-9ce0-4cf8-8de7-9fa6fb8d5acb)
The badge now:
Contribute
Every judgment on this page is open to challenge. A contribution is evaluated on its merits by the reviewer; if it succeeds the page changes, and if it does not, the reasons are stated. Either way the exchange becomes part of the claim’s public record.
Created by extractor · Nov 10, 2026. Every judgment on this page is accompanied by a reasoning trace.