trailAll non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function have real part equal to 1/2.
All non-trivial zeros of every Dirichlet L-function have real part equal to 1/2.
Numerical verification and proven density results· for
The Riemann hypothesis has been verified for the first ten trillion non-trivial zeros of the zeta function.
All non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function up to height 3×10^12 lie on the critical line.
Gourdon's 2004 computation found all of the first 10^13 non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function on the critical line.
At least 40 percent of the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the critical line.
atomic
Analogy with the proven finite-field case· for
The analogue of the Riemann hypothesis for zeta functions of varieties over finite fields is a proven theorem.
atomic
Spectral and random-matrix heuristics· for
The spacing statistics of the zeros of the Riemann zeta function match those of eigenvalues of random Hermitian matrices.
atomic
Claimed proofs· for
Michael Atiyah's 2018 claimed proof establishes the Riemann hypothesis.
atomic
Skeptical considerations· against
The Davenport-Heilbronn function satisfies a Riemann-type functional equation yet has zeros off the critical line.
atomic
claim · mathematicalA proposition of mathematics: true or false by proof rather than by observation. Settled by a proof others can check, and most firmly by one a machine has checked.constitution →claim page ↗︎
All non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function have real part equal to 1/2.
↑SupportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →credence 0.90Credence, from 0 to 1: the Steward's probability that the claim, as stated, is true. Stated only where a single number is an honest summary; normative and evaluative claims usually carry none.constitution →
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
claimA box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →argumentA pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →✓verifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →↑supportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →⇄contestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →○unsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →✕contradictedAvailable evidence weighs against the claim.constitution →?unknownInsufficient information to assess.constitution →◌unassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factopen questionvalue premisetheoremprizeA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules →⊢machine-checked⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rules →supportsthis provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →contradictsthis argues against the parentsteward instructions →assumesbackground the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →requiresa load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.