Minerval
← claim pagemap viewclick a claim to focus on it · hover to preview · ⌫ back
trailCalendar year when an AI company first internally develops an AI that can do any coding task its best engineer can do, faster and cheaper
not yet estimated
Calendar year in which artificial general intelligence is first developed
Extrapolation of coding-capability trends (time horizon, uplift, revenue)
Frontier AI 50% time horizons on METR's task suite have grown approximately exponentially with release date since 2024.
atomic
assumed
Time-horizon trends measured on benchmark software tasks generalize to real-world software work.
A factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →quantity page ↗︎
Calendar year when an AI company first internally develops an AI that can do any coding task its best engineer can do, faster and cheaper
≈ 203080% interval 2027 to 2038, with a 7% chance that The milestone is not reached by 2050 or ever (e.g. a capability plateau, regulation, or catastrophe halting development).
supportssupportsassumes
1depended on by
this rests on ↓
A box is a claim: a single proposition the graph assesses, with its own page and map. Click any claim to centre the map on it.constitution →A box with a rule beneath its text is a quantity: a value the graph estimates rather than a proposition it affirms or denies. Its estimate stands where a claim's status would.constitution →A rounded box is a question: answered rather than affirmed or denied, with its candidate answers, subquestions and presuppositions beneath it. Its mark says how well answered it is.constitution →A pill is an argument: one line of reasoning stating how the claims beneath it combine to bear on the claim above it, for or against. Arguments are not destinations; click their claims to explore.constitution →The evidence, examined directly, establishes the claim.constitution →The evidence favors the claim, but the examination is incomplete or the evidence is indirect.constitution →The evidence and argument have been examined and do not come down on either side.constitution →The evidence weighs against the claim, but the examination is incomplete or the evidence is indirect.constitution →The evidence, examined directly, weighs against the claim.constitution →Insufficient information to assess.constitution →No current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →verified factunsettledvalue premisetheoremA double ring marks a claim with a live prize: an amount in owls offered for a machine-checked proof or disproof of its published formal statement. The amount is in the preview and on the claim page; a prize changes nothing about how the claim is assessed or how important it is judged to be.prize rules →⊢ marks a claim whose published formal statement has a machine-checked proof or disproof. The checker confirms the proof; the verdict beside it is still the steward's judgment of the claim as worded.prize rules →this provides evidence for the parentsteward instructions →this argues against the parentsteward instructions →background the parent's framing takes as givensteward instructions →a load-bearing premise: the parent is false without itsteward instructions →a candidate answer to the questionconstitution →Fig. Detail falls off with distance; every claim is an address.