Browse

Claims

Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.

1 claim

Claims about the cost of AI tools (frontier-model subscriptions, licenses) for individual researchers and graduate students, whether that cost is worth the research payoff, and who should pay — the individual, an advisor, an institution, or a funder. Excludes aggregate AI capital expenditure, AI consumer-price effects, employment effects, and measured productivity experiments considered on their o

Mathematics PhD students should pay for frontier AI subscriptions because they are worth the cost.

UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →normativeA claim about what should be done or how things ought to be, settled by argument rather than evidence alone.constitution →AI mathematical discoveryimportance · minorImportance 0.40, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Contribute

If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its merits; accepted claims are matched against the graph and enter it with their reasoning on record.