Claims
Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.
KindShowingImportancePrizesTopicAI Sycophancy
Claims about AI systems excessively agreeing with, flattering, or affirming users rather than responding accurately or independently. Includes causes, evaluation, and mitigation of this behavior; excludes strategic deception unless that is specifically the topic.
Future research on AI intent-misalignment evaluations and mitigations should distinguish sycophancy from scheming.
UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →normativeA claim about what should be done or how things ought to be, settled by argument rather than evidence alone.constitution →AI SchemingAI Alignmentimportance · minorImportance 0.40, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
Contribute
If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim or a question entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its wording; accepted proposals are matched against the graph before they enter it.