Claims

Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.

2 results

Event-by-event fluctuations of conserved charges (net-proton, net-charge, net-baryon) and their cumulant ratios measured in heavy-ion collisions, including non-critical baselines (e.g. Skellam, binomial) used to judge deviations and the model dependence of such comparisons; broad QCD phase-structure claims belong under QCD phase diagram instead.

The significance of net-proton cumulant deviations depends on which non-critical baseline model is used for comparison

UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions QCD phase diagramimportance · minorImportance 0.30, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

STAR 3 GeV fixed-target proton cumulants are consistent with hadronic transport calculations, indicating hadronic-dominated matter at that energy

UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions QCD phase diagramimportance · settledImportance 0.20, from 0 to 1 · settled: uncontested, so low even when much depends on it. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Contribute

If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim or a question entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its wording; accepted proposals are matched against the graph before they enter it.