Minerval

Browse

Claims

Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.

KindShowingImportancePrizesTopicDecision Theory2 results

The formal study of rational choice under uncertainty, including decision rules, preference structure, and axioms for selecting among acts or lotteries. Excludes empirical studies of how people make decisions unless their formal choice-theoretic structure is central.

Agents immune to money pumps and dominated strategies maximize expected utility.
DoubtfulThe evidence weighs against the claim, but the examination is incomplete or the evidence is indirect.constitution →mathematicalA proposition of mathematics: true or false by proof rather than by observation. Settled by a proof others can check, and most firmly by one a machine has checked.constitution →Expected Utility Theoryimportance · notableImportance 0.45, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
Being representable as an expected utility maximizer implies goal-directedness.
UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →definitionalA claim about what a term means. It earns a node only when the definition itself is disputed.constitution →Expected Utility TheoryAI Goal-Directednessimportance · notableImportance 0.45, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Contribute

If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim or a question entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its wording; accepted proposals are matched against the graph before they enter it.