Minerval

Browse

Claims

Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.

KindShowingImportancePrizesTopicHyperlink Source Support1 result

Claims about whether hyperlinks or cited sources in online articles actually substantiate the particular assertions they are attached to, including rates of unsupported or mismatched links. Excludes reader click behavior and general factual errors unrelated to source-to-claim support.

Proportion of hyperlinks offered as support in online articles that do not support their attached claims
≈ 18%QuantityA quantity: a value the graph estimates rather than a proposition it affirms or denies. Its estimate stands where a claim's status would.constitution →Web Content Accuracyimportance · minorImportance 0.30, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Contribute

If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim or a question entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its wording; accepted proposals are matched against the graph before they enter it.