Minerval

Browse

Claims

Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.

ShowingImportancePrizesTopicPrecision nutrition2 claims

Inter-individual variability in physiological responses to diet (e.g., glycemic, lipemic, blood-pressure responses) and its predictors (genetics, microbiome, baseline metabolic state), underlying the goal of individualized dietary recommendations. Covers hyper-/hypo-responder findings; not for population-average diet–disease effects or for between-country differences in associations.

There is marked inter-individual variability in blood cholesterol response to dietary cholesterol intake.
VerifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitutionempirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionDietary cholesterolNutritionLDL cholesterolimportance · minorImportance 0.32, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution
Individuals differ substantially in the efficiency of intestinal cholesterol absorption.
UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitutionempirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitutionDietary cholesterolimportance · settledImportance 0.20, from 0 to 1 · settled: uncontested, so low even when much depends on it. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution

Contribute

If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its merits; accepted claims are matched against the graph and enter it with their reasoning on record.