Minerval

Claims

Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.

KindShowingImportancePrizesTopicPrecision nutrition2 results

Inter-individual variability in physiological responses to diet (e.g., glycemic, lipemic, blood-pressure responses) and its predictors (genetics, microbiome, baseline metabolic state), underlying the goal of individualized dietary recommendations. Covers hyper-/hypo-responder findings; not for population-average diet–disease effects or for between-country differences in associations.

There is marked inter-individual variability in blood cholesterol response to dietary cholesterol intake.
VerifiedThe evidence, examined directly, establishes the claim.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Dietary cholesterolNutritionLDL cholesterolimportance · minorImportance 0.32, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
Individuals differ substantially in the efficiency of intestinal cholesterol absorption.
UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Dietary cholesterolimportance · settledImportance 0.20, from 0 to 1 · settled: uncontested, so low even when much depends on it. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →

Contribute

If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim or a question entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its wording; accepted proposals are matched against the graph before they enter it.