Minerval

← evals

Background

Not measured yet

What no eval covers, and where the design itself may be wrong.

Not measured

  • Anything on the production models. Every committed run so far is on the cheap tier or the development defaults, capped. The next thing to do is three production-profile runs of one cluster.
  • The noise floor. Idempotency ran once on the cheap tier and lost its second arm; no comparison has a scale yet.
  • Anything adversarial, in results. The suite, the gambit library and the red team are built; no arm has run.
  • Governance under simulated people. The scenario and the personas are built; the Reviewer and Arbitrator have been read once, under the scripted scenario, on the cheap tier.
  • Model fidelity. No swap has run; the allocator’s tiering rests on a guess.
  • The judge’s newest dimensions. Sycophancy, hedging, canonical-form strength and political bias: judged on cheap-tier runs, never reviewed.
  • Calibration. Nothing seeded into production, nothing resolved, no market baseline.
  • Paraphrase and frame invariance. The same proposition reworded, or stated by a proponent and a critic, has no arm.
  • The live graph, as read. The monitors read it; nothing measures the quality of what visitors read.

Detail

Where the design may be wrong
  • The judge is weaker than the judged. Sonnet grades Opus 5.5, one model family, no second judge.
  • The judge’s reviewer wrote its prompt. An outside reader would be a stronger check.
  • Agreement is measured by another matcher, with a hand-picked embedding threshold never checked against the golden pairs.
  • The golden suite is thirty in-house pairs at its ceiling. It will catch regressions on those thirty.
  • Clusters are small; the judge sample is a fraction of a large one and the whole of a small one.
  • The cost model is extrapolated from one capped Sonnet run.
  • Predictions are in-house and correlated, with no crowd baseline.
  • Authorship counts rewrites, not improvements. Whether the Matcher’s rewording was better is not judged.
  • The 1–5 scales may be dead weight. The first review found they carried nothing the flags did not.
The plan's nine suites
suitewhatstanding
S1per-PR golden suiteMatcher pairs in CI; canonical-form goldens built
S2quality scorecardbuilt; newest four dimensions unreviewed
S3properties and stabilitysix properties, cascade stability and assessment history built; paraphrase and frame invariance not
S4adversarial robustnessall four cells built; never run
S5downstream-reasoner probebuilt; never run
S6calibration trackbuilt; not seeded into production
S7model economics and lifecycleguard, swap, discover and adopt built
S8persona simulationphase one built (twenty personas); never run
S9production monitorsbuilt; scheduler off by default