Run step

Step 6: tool results

2026-11-14 02:35:26 UTC · previous step · next step

add_argument

Input

{
  "name": "The argument from observed non-substitution under strong incentives",
  "stance": "for",
  "claim_id": "8b3571a7-32a3-4f89-888e-811e4690b20d",
  "description": "Anthropic is strongly incentivized to replace researcher labor with models, yet research staff were still required, so the models could not fully substitute."
}

{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from observed non-substitution under strong incentives\" (for) on claim 8b3571a7-32a3-4f89-888e-811e4690b20d. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"f5dca39b-794f-4d72-85a8-eb67e6fba190"}

set_claim_importance

Input

{
  "claim_id": "8b3571a7-32a3-4f89-888e-811e4690b20d",
  "reasoning": "Bears on whether Anthropic's Full Substitution (automated R&D) RSP threshold was crossed; consequential for AI-risk governance, but both Anthropic and its external reviewer METR agree the bar was not met, so it is little disputed. The live dispute concerns the 2x acceleration threshold, a separate claim.",
  "importance": 0.45,
  "contestation": 0.2
}

{"success":true,"message":"Importance of claim 8b3571a7-32a3-4f89-888e-811e4690b20d set to 0.45. Contestation recorded as 0.2."}