Step 10: tool results

{
  "claim_id": "cd617e0f-7b7c-4d5c-a8a5-c2ebf2aead53",
  "reasoning": "First pass. Added two for-arguments: the Cedar demonstration in the auditing game, and output indistinguishability in principle. Placed the unplaced 2512.07810 passage; the second passage was a duplicate. Assessed as supported (credence 0.8). Noted that \"accuracy-based\" is the gloss of arXiv 2604.26206, and that no test of C3 against imitation-trained organisms was found. Importance 0.45, contestation 0.3. No subclaims minted, given the budget and the claim's narrowness. Follow-up worth doing: read the SPAR Cedar black-box dashboard and the C3 paper's organism list.",
  "action_taken": "structured_and_assessed"
}

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "Structured (two arguments) and assessed as supported.",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Read the black-box and trial-game results of 2512.07810. 'Accuracy-based' traces to the gloss in arXiv 2604.26206; the game's methods were mostly transcript reading and prompting. No published test of C3 against logit-matched imitators was found, though a SPAR dashboard on Cedar exists and was not read. Assessed as supported, credence 0.8.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}