Step 10: tool results

{
  "claim_id": "37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c",
  "reasoning": "Kept atomic: the claim turns on one body of evidence, the C³ results across settings, plus an untested question of adaptive robustness, so no subclaims or named arguments. Recorded three instances: the ICML abstract and lay summary (affirms), a workshop-companion summary with low recall for password-locked models (denies), and a stress-testing preprint (mentions). Assessed doubtful, credence 0.12. The verdict agrees with the parent's seed. The parent already relies on the same figures, so no notification was needed.",
  "action_taken": "assessed_first_pass"
}

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "First assessment recorded: doubtful, credence 0.12.",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Assess pass done: doubtful. High recall is shown only in the best prompted case; recall for fine-tuned sandbaggers is 37 to 53 percent.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}