Run step
Step 6: tool results
record_claim_instance
Input
{
"url": "https://icml.cc/virtual/2026/poster/61923",
"title": "Same Question, Different Lies: Cross-Context Consistency (C³) for Black-Box Sandbagging Detection (ICML 2026 poster, lay summary)",
"stance": "affirms",
"context": "Lay summary of the paper introducing C³; the abstract itself says more cautiously that C³ maintains 'a classification signal where other black-box methods fail' across prompted and fine-tuned scenarios.",
"speaker": "Yulong Lin, Pablo Bernabeu-Pérez, Benjamin Arnav, Lennie Wells, Mary Phuong",
"claim_id": "37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c",
"confidence": 0.6,
"publication": "ICML 2026",
"source_date": "2026-07",
"source_kind": "conference_paper",
"verbatim_text": "We tested C³ across a range of sandbagging scenarios and showed that it reliably detected fake incompetence even where existing methods failed, offering a practical tool to help ensure AI safety evaluations can be trusted."
}{"source_kind":"conference_paper","success":true,"instance_id":"54aa7d23-8802-43ab-9312-8bae3090ac44","source_id":"522ccdc8-958d-4231-8969-986f9124a13c","message":"Recorded a affirms instance of claim 37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c from https://icml.cc/virtual/2026/poster/61923. It now counts among the claim's source instances; weigh its stance in your assessment like any other."}record_claim_instance
Input
{
"url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2611.14950",
"title": "Stress-Testing Sandbagging Detection Under Adaptive Attack",
"stance": "mentions",
"context": "Related work; the paper shows a text-only sandbagging audit falling from AUC 0.978 to 0.560 under two rounds of adaptive retraining, and notes C³ has not yet faced such an attack.",
"speaker": "Bhoj Rani Soopal, Aarohi Agrawal, Josh Karthikeyan, Edward Lue Chee Lip",
"claim_id": "37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c",
"source_date": "2026-11-11",
"source_kind": "preprint",
"verbatim_text": "C 3 , which looks for inconsistent answers across paraphrases ( Lin et al., 2026 ) . C 3 is the strongest current black-box detector and would be the natural next target for an adaptive attack."
}{"source_kind":"preprint","success":true,"instance_id":"493c90b3-db3c-453f-9716-cc16fa2f4477","source_id":"5dbf8d97-7669-40c3-91c2-6d001a3432a5","message":"Recorded a mentions instance of claim 37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c from https://arxiv.org/html/2611.14950. The claim page shows it among the sources that mention the claim; it takes no side and is never counted as affirming or denying."}record_claim_instance
Input
{
"url": "https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/work/when-lie-detectors-learn-model-identity-confounds-in-black-box-sandbagging/wrk_cc46e467031489731dcb56615007b479",
"title": "When Lie Detectors Learn Model Identity: Confounds in Black-Box Sandbagging Detection (summary)",
"stance": "denies",
"context": "Summary of the workshop companion to the C³ paper; reports moderate recall for fine-tuned (password-locked) sandbaggers, which cuts against high recall across fine-tuned cases.",
"claim_id": "37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c",
"confidence": 0.6,
"publication": "Lacuna",
"source_kind": "webpage",
"verbatim_text": "Password-locked sandbaggers: C³ achieved 52.9% recall on WMDP and 36.9% on GSM8K, outperforming other methods but still facing challenges."
}{"source_kind":"webpage","success":true,"instance_id":"3ac6fa55-29f5-4d35-9697-1948df2dc4e5","source_id":"d0ffc6d3-8e70-42cc-8e8f-f9733951b893","message":"Recorded a denies instance of claim 37c8f4aa-8784-403b-979f-fc06db79597c from https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/work/when-lie-detectors-learn-model-identity-confounds-in-black-box-sandbagging/wrk_cc46e467031489731dcb56615007b479. It now counts among the claim's source instances; weigh its stance in your assessment like any other."}