Run step
Step 14: tool results
add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from the authors' ten-organism evaluation",
"stance": "for",
"claim_id": "b9d866f3-2bda-456c-a10d-bc16f0450577",
"description": "Steering, max-activation and coverage results on 10 narrow fine-tuning model organisms, plus a grader comparison with ADL."
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the authors' ten-organism evaluation\" (for) on claim b9d866f3-2bda-456c-a10d-bc16f0450577. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"9b1c1bc2-d203-469c-a1c3-4f87fea74c50"}add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from non-like-for-like comparisons",
"stance": "against",
"claim_id": "b9d866f3-2bda-456c-a10d-bc16f0450577",
"description": "The baseline comparisons use author-judged success criteria, only crosscoder variants as SAE baselines, mismatched sparsity budgets, and ADL's reported scores from a different protocol, so they cannot establish superiority or parity."
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from non-like-for-like comparisons\" (against) on claim b9d866f3-2bda-456c-a10d-bc16f0450577. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"26daf8cc-8021-4b36-a0df-55008a689c41"}