Minerval

← run 3872ff27

Run step

Step 16: tool results

2026-11-14 02:36:00 UTC · previous step · next step

add_relationship_edge

Input
{
  "child_id": "ec9c31d9-8ba5-4107-86f2-25ee089e89a1",
  "relation": "supports",
  "parent_id": "0655bddb-4381-4431-bc7e-c04ae510a5d6",
  "reasoning": "A doubled benchmark growth rate sustained over the year since October 2025 is the core observation favouring a slope change over a single level shift.",
  "argument_id": "c8f0fd83-de50-484c-8bb1-720e91af4494"
}
{"success":true,"message":"Linked existing claim ec9c31d9-8ba5-4107-86f2-25ee089e89a1 as a subclaim of 0655bddb-4381-4431-bc7e-c04ae510a5d6 (supports). Grouped it under argument \"The argument from a persistent slope change in AECI and leading indicators\".","child_claim_id":"ec9c31d9-8ba5-4107-86f2-25ee089e89a1","relationship_id":"0dd2c5ee-d509-4eab-bb87-42825b48e48f","created":true,"argument_id":"c8f0fd83-de50-484c-8bb1-720e91af4494","grouped":true}

add_relationship_edge

Input
{
  "child_id": "d4cfffee-9259-4d52-92b1-3b8979884218",
  "relation": "supports",
  "parent_id": "0655bddb-4381-4431-bc7e-c04ae510a5d6",
  "reasoning": "Elevated growth in internal leading indicators (training-pipeline metrics) is independent-ish corroboration of a continuing faster rate rather than a one-off jump.",
  "argument_id": "c8f0fd83-de50-484c-8bb1-720e91af4494"
}
{"success":true,"message":"Linked existing claim d4cfffee-9259-4d52-92b1-3b8979884218 as a subclaim of 0655bddb-4381-4431-bc7e-c04ae510a5d6 (supports). Grouped it under argument \"The argument from a persistent slope change in AECI and leading indicators\".","child_claim_id":"d4cfffee-9259-4d52-92b1-3b8979884218","relationship_id":"cb17c560-81c3-4030-adcc-aac0372cdb75","created":true,"argument_id":"c8f0fd83-de50-484c-8bb1-720e91af4494","grouped":true}

add_relationship_edge

Input
{
  "child_id": "f88b4b60-915f-4e78-a20b-59a370cdd0fe",
  "relation": "contradicts",
  "parent_id": "0655bddb-4381-4431-bc7e-c04ae510a5d6",
  "reasoning": "If the frontier-wide AECI acceleration is much smaller than Anthropic-only (METR finds about 1.4x vs 1.9x), part of Anthropic's apparent acceleration may be catch-up from a subfrontier position, a one-off rather than a sustained change.",
  "argument_id": "0ee06e33-b1c9-4b30-9320-76c1cc76471b"
}
{"success":true,"message":"Linked existing claim f88b4b60-915f-4e78-a20b-59a370cdd0fe as a subclaim of 0655bddb-4381-4431-bc7e-c04ae510a5d6 (contradicts). Grouped it under argument \"The argument from catch-up and benchmark artifacts\".","child_claim_id":"f88b4b60-915f-4e78-a20b-59a370cdd0fe","relationship_id":"acc4edbd-1b7e-45d0-a678-6c7063ca6c8b","created":true,"argument_id":"0ee06e33-b1c9-4b30-9320-76c1cc76471b","grouped":true}