Run step

Step 8: tool results

2026-11-11 20:23:14 UTC · previous step · next step

record_claim_instance

Input

{
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11473",
  "title": "Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety",
  "stance": "affirms",
  "context": "Position paper by authors across major AI labs arguing CoT monitoring is valuable but depends on models reasoning in human language, and that this may be lost.",
  "speaker": "Tomek Korbak et al. (41 authors)",
  "claim_id": "3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4",
  "confidence": 0.9,
  "publication": "arXiv",
  "source_date": "2025-07-15",
  "verbatim_text": "AI systems that \"think\" in human language offer a unique opportunity for AI safety: we can monitor their chains of thought (CoT) for the intent to misbehave. ... Because CoT monitorability may be fragile, we recommend that frontier model developers consider the impact of development decisions on CoT monitorability."
}

{"success":true,"instance_id":"15356466-b123-439c-94a8-4a961e0dd4c9","source_id":"c46f9de1-cb5c-46e8-ae2e-fd7bb6f822da","message":"Recorded a affirms instance of claim 3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4 from https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11473. It now counts among the claim's source instances; weigh its stance in your assessment like any other."}

add_relationship_edge

Input

{
  "child_id": "74c2c8af-34f0-4261-9f7f-87a3499a31fd",
  "relation": "supports",
  "parent_id": "3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4",
  "reasoning": "If current training practices can already degrade CoT monitorability, that is direct evidence for the second half of the claim: future models may stop externalizing legible reasoning."
}

{"success":true,"message":"Linked existing claim 74c2c8af-34f0-4261-9f7f-87a3499a31fd as a subclaim of 3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4 (supports).","child_claim_id":"74c2c8af-34f0-4261-9f7f-87a3499a31fd","relationship_id":"bc782c36-d4f6-46f9-9484-2ef2e4acc193","created":true}

add_relationship_edge

Input

{
  "child_id": "afe578c2-a359-4a0a-9090-9af20c889ee2",
  "relation": "supports",
  "parent_id": "3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4",
  "reasoning": "Supports the dependence half: as reasoning drifts from standard English, legible-CoT oversight becomes less reliable, which is what dependence on legible externalization implies."
}

{"success":true,"message":"Linked existing claim afe578c2-a359-4a0a-9090-9af20c889ee2 as a subclaim of 3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4 (supports).","child_claim_id":"afe578c2-a359-4a0a-9090-9af20c889ee2","relationship_id":"7763209d-381c-47c0-936c-c99d3f327c85","created":true}

add_related_claim

Input

{
  "kind": "related",
  "claim_id": "3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4",
  "reasoning": "The necessity argument (hard tasks force externalized reasoning) is the main reason to expect legibility to persist, bearing on how likely the possibility in this claim is.",
  "other_claim_id": "c02e136f-deec-4469-acd6-c424803afa94"
}

{"success":true,"linked":true,"link_id":"9febd04f-8d54-489d-b51e-fd74939b058c","message":"Linked 3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4 <-> c02e136f-deec-4469-acd6-c424803afa94 (related); it now shows as a see-also on both claims."}

add_related_claim

Input

{
  "kind": "related",
  "claim_id": "3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4",
  "reasoning": "If LLM monitors can read human-illegible CoT, the dependence on human legibility specifically is weakened; relevant qualification.",
  "other_claim_id": "692e894d-b6f0-4c09-bf66-46fe1d98fa0a"
}

{"success":true,"linked":true,"link_id":"586f985c-0851-4b09-b903-8abae5b574ec","message":"Linked 3448b7af-6fa0-4c48-a097-64882df6b2d4 <-> 692e894d-b6f0-4c09-bf66-46fe1d98fa0a (related); it now shows as a see-also on both claims."}