Step 2: tool results

get_claim

{
  "include": [
    "arguments",
    "subclaims",
    "related",
    "findings",
    "dependents"
  ],
  "claim_id": "353f02bc-ebdf-443f-a09e-38209d365bd4"
}

{"claim":{"id":"353f02bc-ebdf-443f-a09e-38209d365bd4","kind":"claim","canonical_form":"Verifying an AI system's output for correctness and safety requires less capability than producing it.","claim_type":"empirical_derived","state":"active","decomposition_status":"complete","importance":0.5,"contestation":0.6,"domains":[],"tags":[{"slug":"scalable-oversight","name":"Scalable Oversight"},{"slug":"ai-safety","name":"AI Safety"}],"steward_state":"running","stewarded_at":"2026-11-11T19:01:52.577Z","canonical_direction_note":null,"created_at":"2026-11-11T19:00:19.653Z","updated_at":"2026-11-11T19:01:49.844Z","page_url":"https://minerval.ai/claims/353f02bc-ebdf-443f-a09e-38209d365bd4"},"assessment":null,"preliminary_seed":{"credence":null,"note":"This is the premise behind most proposals for weaker overseers checking stronger systems, and it holds unevenly. For outputs with a crisp test, such as a proof, a program with a specification or a factual answer with checkable sources, checking is plainly cheaper than producing. For open-ended work where the failure may be a subtle flaw the checker does not know to look for, such as a hidden backdoor or a plan with a delayed side effect, the asymmetry weakens or reverses: the auditor must anticipate every route the producer could take. Experiments in code auditing find weaker auditors missing most deliberately hidden flaws from frontier attackers. No single number summarises a proposition whose truth differs this much by task type.","seeded_by_claim_id":"2d5868e4-745c-474f-ac6f-cc9cbc25ea8c"},"quantity":null,"threshold_of":null,"question":null,"formalization":null,"formalization_pending":null,"formalization_history":[],"verification":null,"lean_checks":[],"lean_checks_total":0,"waiting_messages":[{"trigger":"structure_and_assess","from":"the system","sender_node_id":null,"sent_at":"2026-11-11T19:00:19.867Z","paid":false,"summary":"New claim onboarded. Give it the structure and assessment its importance warrants; a minor or settled claim may need no decomposition."},{"trigger":"mandate_plan","from":"a mandate's plan","sender_node_id":null,"sent_at":"2026-11-11T19:01:49.874Z","paid":true,"summary":"A funded mandate scheduled a pass on this claim."}],"requests":[],"requests_total":0,"subclaim_count":0,"instance_count":0,"source_map":null,"related":[],"findings":[],"arguments":[],"subclaims":[],"subclaims_assessed":0,"dependents":[{"id":"2d5868e4-745c-474f-ac6f-cc9cbc25ea8c","text":"AI oversight success rates decline as the capability gap between overseer and overseen system grows.","claim_type":"empirical_derived","node_kind":"claim","relation_type":"contradicts","reasoning":"If checking stays within reach of a much weaker overseer, a growing gap need not reduce oversight success; if it does not, the a priori case for the parent goes through. Both the argument from the overseer's limits and the argument from compensating design turn on it.","importance":0.5,"assessment_status":"supported","assessment_confidence":0.7,"assessment_credence":0.75,"bounty_micro_usd":null,"checked":null,"formal":false}],"dependents_total":1}