Run step
Step 4: tool results
add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from high safety in the founding control evaluations",
"stance": "for",
"claim_id": "ea57432c-c473-4452-94e1-16102c805446",
"description": "Published protocol results against human-designed or prompted attack policies show most attempts caught."
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from high safety in the founding control evaluations\" (for) on claim ea57432c-c473-4452-94e1-16102c805446. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"852cd0b1-c573-4951-a4ad-02ec845342f6"}add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from adaptive and monitor-aware attackers",
"stance": "against",
"claim_id": "ea57432c-c473-4452-94e1-16102c805446",
"description": "Later evaluations with attackers that know or target the protocol bring safety down to near the auditing-only baseline."
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from adaptive and monitor-aware attackers\" (against) on claim ea57432c-c473-4452-94e1-16102c805446. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"7017ded0-d321-44ff-80c4-5f97ea235737"}