Run step

Step 12: tool results

2026-11-14 02:28:13 UTC · previous step · next step

evaluate_argument

Input

{
  "verdict": "likely",
  "decisive": false,
  "evaluation": "Granting that realistic tasks decompose into steps as much simpler than the whole as the algorithmic tasks did, the observed thousandfold saving makes a large saving on realistic tasks likely. The argument lives on that similarity premise, which the source does not defend and which the toy tasks, chosen for clean decomposability, cannot establish.",
  "argument_id": "aabfd608-54bf-4a9e-a901-87a3c94c8108"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Evaluation recorded for argument \"The argument from the algorithmic-task experiments\": likely."}

evaluate_argument

Input

{
  "verdict": "slight",
  "decisive": false,
  "evaluation": "Granting that decomposing with subtask help is easier than solving unaided, it follows that decomposition needs no more supervision than direct solution, but not that it needs much less. The step from easier to perform to much cheaper to supervise is where the argument is thin, and it says nothing about the cost of humans producing good decompositions.",
  "argument_id": "920417c3-d150-4426-bfe8-9fb9add56d4c"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Evaluation recorded for argument \"The argument that decomposing is strictly easier than solving\": slight."}

evaluate_argument

Input

{
  "verdict": "slight",
  "decisive": false,
  "evaluation": "Granting that humans found realistic tasks hard to decompose and judge step by step, this raises doubt that decomposition demonstrations are cheap, but the experiments measured human factored reasoning, not machine-learning supervision counts, and early protocols may simply have been immature. It weakens the extrapolation without showing the saving is absent.",
  "argument_id": "26705e2a-1bae-4ef2-af33-3eb5852f67b2"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Evaluation recorded for argument \"The argument from the difficulty of decomposing realistic tasks\": slight."}

log_stewardship_decision

Input

{
  "claim_id": "a4bfe1a1-0d33-4876-b6ab-40989cb38bac",
  "reasoning": "First pass. Added three named arguments (toy-task experiments for, strictly-easier for, difficulty of realistic decomposition against), placed the two source passages, recorded Ought instance. No subclaims minted: the premises are not reusable nodes worth their cost at importance 0.35. Assessed inconclusive, credence 0.45. No dependents to notify.",
  "action_taken": "structured_and_assessed"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Stewardship decision logged for claim a4bfe1a1-0d33-4876-b6ab-40989cb38bac: structured_and_assessed","action":"structured_and_assessed","reasoning":"First pass. Added three named arguments (toy-task experiments for, strictly-easier for, difficulty of realistic decomposition against), placed the two source passages, recorded Ought instance. No subclaims minted: the premises are not reusable nodes worth their cost at importance 0.35. Assessed inconclusive, credence 0.45. No dependents to notify."}

answer_messages

Input

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "Structured with three arguments and assessed inconclusive (credence 0.45).",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Assess pass done: inconclusive, credence 0.45, marginal yield 0.3.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}

{"success":true,"message":"Recorded 2 answer(s); 0 reached their senders as replies."}