Run step

Step 28: tool results

2026-11-15 07:18:41 UTC · previous step · next step

evaluate_argument

Input

{
  "verdict": "slight",
  "evaluation": "Granting that the target concept sits in a few latents, the conclusion still needs the spurious cue to be less cleanly isolated than the concept. Where [[claim:b2d08722-0692-48b5-9c00-b3628ceb99b5|spurious cues are as well represented by latents]], a sparse probe has no reason to prefer the true signal, so the inductive bias favours the claim only a little.",
  "argument_id": "9903c59d-51d9-4797-b696-379a92f9128e"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Evaluation recorded for argument \"The argument from the inductive bias of interpretable sparse bases\": slight."}

evaluate_argument

Input

{
  "verdict": "likely",
  "evaluation": "Granting that [[claim:0cfd9ad2-65a2-49ef-8fa2-5f035e22073f|SAE sparse probes underperform tuned logistic regression under covariate shift and label noise]], the denial is likely for current SAEs. It is not certain, because those shifts are not controlled spurious confounds and the tests used imperfect SAEs, which the \"sufficiently good\" qualifier excludes.",
  "argument_id": "5ee763da-20ce-4dca-b9da-7bb5524709d1"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Evaluation recorded for argument \"The argument from head-to-head out-of-distribution comparisons\": likely."}

set_claim_importance

Input

{
  "claim_id": "20fee30f-0192-4b8c-b479-83c3f230014d",
  "reasoning": "A notable crux within the debate over whether SAEs are useful downstream; it motivated major studies, but its reach is confined to interpretability methodology.",
  "importance": 0.4,
  "contestation": 0.45
}

{"success":true,"message":"Importance of claim 20fee30f-0192-4b8c-b479-83c3f230014d set to 0.4. Contestation recorded as 0.45."}

answer_messages

Input

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "Structured with one for and one against argument and assessed as doubtful.",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Read the GDM post and arXiv 2502.16681 setups: latent selection, the L2-tuned dense baseline, how the shifts were made, the non-SAE remedies. No study induced a controlled confound; assessed doubtful at credence 0.3.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}

{"success":true,"message":"Recorded 2 answer(s); 0 reached their senders as replies."}