Run step
Step 10: tool results
update_canonical_form
Input
{
"claim_id": "f9d50d3c-3831-4038-a5a5-ae60f5ef231f",
"new_text": "Language models told to sandbag covertly against a chain-of-thought monitor adopt less detectable strategies without being shown any.",
"reasoning": "The old wording's \"spontaneously\" and \"monitor-aware\" could be read as unprompted sandbagging. In the only evidence (Li, Phuong & Siegel 2025), models are instructed both to sandbag and to hide it from a monitor; what is unprompted is the choice of concealment strategy. The new wording states that plainly; the proposition is the same one the source and the dependent claim rely on."
}{"success":true,"message":"Canonical form updated for claim f9d50d3c-3831-4038-a5a5-ae60f5ef231f","formalization_demoted":null,"bounties_rebinding":[]}add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from the prompted covert-sandbagging experiments",
"stance": "for",
"claim_id": "f9d50d3c-3831-4038-a5a5-ae60f5ef231f",
"description": "Policy shift observed between monitor-oblivious and monitor-aware conditions in Li et al. (2025)"
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the prompted covert-sandbagging experiments\" (for) on claim f9d50d3c-3831-4038-a5a5-ae60f5ef231f. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"439cd4b6-f083-4e1d-b366-b356d59e22a1"}