Run step

Step 10: tool results

2026-11-13 21:45:40 UTC · previous step · next step

write_argument

Input

{
  "content": "Published evaluations of AI research agents fall mainly into two kinds. Benchmarks such as MLE-bench, RE-Bench and PaperBench test agents on narrow tasks with verifiable scores or on replicating known results, which leaves out choosing questions, judging what is publishable and recovering from dead ends. The other kind submits AI-generated papers to blind peer review, whose verdicts are noisy, vary between reviewers and say little about how a paper was produced. If neither kind measures open-ended research directly and few studies of other kinds exist, the direct evidence on open-ended research capability is thin.",
  "argument_id": "d631d522-5f76-4cee-8a61-4817901a5619"
}

{"success":true,"message":"Written form saved for argument \"The argument from the limits of existing evaluation methods\"."}

place_argument_passage

Input

{
  "stance": "advances",
  "reading": "premise_unstated",
  "argument_id": "d631d522-5f76-4cee-8a61-4817901a5619",
  "instance_id": "f3121b41-2c8c-46af-b7d1-13acf771665b"
}

{"success":true,"instance_id":"f3121b41-2c8c-46af-b7d1-13acf771665b","message":"Placed the passage on argument \"The argument from the limits of existing evaluation methods\" as a advances instance."}