Step 5: assistant

thinking

Calls add_argument

{
  "name": "The argument from the two dominant evaluation modes",
  "stance": "for",
  "claim_id": "6d318e34-dfe2-4f86-a5d8-d7f71179125d",
  "description": "Existing evaluations are either narrow verifiable benchmarks, which exclude open-ended research, or blind peer review of AI papers, which is noisy and low-quality; so neither measures open-ended research ability well."
}

Calls add_argument

{
  "name": "The argument from expert-graded and long-horizon evaluations",
  "stance": "against",
  "claim_id": "6d318e34-dfe2-4f86-a5d8-d7f71179125d",
  "description": "Some current evaluations (expert-graded research tasks, long-horizon agentic benchmarks, replication benchmarks) do capture meaningful parts of research ability, so the measurement gap is partial rather than wholesale."
}