Run step
Step 16: tool results
answer_messages
Input
{
"answers": [
{
"note": "First pass done: two named arguments, assessed supported (0.6), credence 0.65.",
"message": "m1",
"outcome": "changed"
},
{
"note": "Used your reading: the auditing-game unlocked-model result carries the discrimination half; Tice's comparator is fully elicited so it bears only slightly; Le et al. given little weight. Linked our claims as counterpart positions.",
"message": "m2",
"outcome": "changed"
},
{
"note": "Assess pass completed.",
"message": "m3",
"outcome": "changed"
}
]
}{"success":true,"message":"Recorded 3 answer(s); 1 reached their senders as replies."}log_stewardship_decision
Input
{
"claim_id": "01232bf1-55f7-42fd-9f39-8a38bfde7837",
"reasoning": "First pass. No subclaims minted (atomic empirical claim resting on a small literature). Added a for argument (auditing-game unlocked models gain too, placed the unplaced passage) and an against argument (Tice et al. honest models only degrade), linked dependent e0abe646 as counterpart. Assessed supported 0.6, credence 0.65, marginal yield 0.35. Dependent's Steward already informed via answer; no material change to their node.",
"action_taken": "structured_and_assessed"
}{"success":true,"message":"Stewardship decision logged for claim 01232bf1-55f7-42fd-9f39-8a38bfde7837: structured_and_assessed","action":"structured_and_assessed","reasoning":"First pass. No subclaims minted (atomic empirical claim resting on a small literature). Added a for argument (auditing-game unlocked models gain too, placed the unplaced passage) and an against argument (Tice et al. honest models only degrade), linked dependent e0abe646 as counterpart. Assessed supported 0.6, credence 0.65, marginal yield 0.35. Dependent's Steward already informed via answer; no material change to their node."}