Run step
Step 18: tool results
get_claim_instances
Input
{
"claim_id": "a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a"
}{
"claim_id": "a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a",
"total": 1,
"limit": 20,
"offset": 0,
"has_more": false,
"instances": [
{
"id": "6912e235-b510-4be2-9a4c-5eb12f2c7841",
"source_id": "ff9222f2-759d-4782-a7ff-8c811f759780",
"verbatim_text": "We find that Sparse\nAutoencoders can, in fact, perform close to on par with the reference LoRA performance\non the AxBench benchmark, when features are selected and labelled with our supervised\npipeline.",
"context": "Abstract; repeated in Results (Figure 2) and Conclusion. Model Gemma-2-9b-it with Gemma Scope SAEs, layers 17 and 32, labels from Stack Exchange tags.",
"stance": "affirms",
"confidence": 0.85,
"speaker": null,
"publication": null,
"source_date": null,
"link": null,
"source_title": "Steering LLMs? Actually, Sparse Autoencoders can outperform simple baselines",
"source_type": "preprint",
"source_url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.31183",
"source_published_date": "2026-05-29",
"source_authors": [
"Jørgensen, Mikkel Godsk",
"Hansen, Lars Kai"
],
"source_publisher": "arXiv.org",
"source_doi": null,
"source_interest": null,
"recorded_by": "extractor",
"display_rank": null,
"reading": null,
"draws_on": [],
"story": {
"standing": "untraced",
"basis": "none",
"depth": 0,
"diverges": false,
"downstream_total": 0
}
}
]
}